CW Ops

Thursday, April 15, 2021


Keynote & Breakouts: 2:00 - 3:15 ET
1-1 Networking: 3:30 - 5:00 ET

Staffing Firms receive Four 1-1s with MSPs while supplies last.  50% off for Club members. MSPs meet with 8 staffing executives.

*This is the official replacement for the In-person 2020 MSP/Supplier Summit*

Ready to scale your staffing businesses and on-site CW programs within a high-volume global model? 

Staffing Leaders collaborate with your MSP and Buyer Guides as they prepare you to support the largest contingent workforce programs in the world.

Operations discussions involve..

  • Supplier Optimization
  • Contractor processes and engagement
  • Workflow, Req flow, order fulfillment
  • Legal and compliance

Optimization discussions involve..

  • Total Talent Management
  • Leveraging Technology
  • Strategy and Stakeholder Engagement
  • Alignment w/Corporate Initiatives (D&I, etc).

Who should attend?

  1. Staffing Owners, Executives and Solutions Sales
  2. Managed Service Provider (MSP) Execs and Managers
  3. Internally managed CW Program leads from F1000
"Thanks for hosting that event yesterday! I learned quite a bit, and made some solid connections that have led to follow up meetings. Can't wait for the next one!"

Professional Facilitation

45-mins of dialogue with takeaways and actions

60-minutes of 1:1 Meetings

5 12-min private Meetings with video

Nice MSP : Supplier Ratios

50:50 MSP:Suppliers

FREE Tickets Available

Free for first 20 attendees

Program (ET timing)

  • 2:00 Welcome
  • 2:05 Keynote: 360 Degrees of Contingent Labor Measurement
    Join us in a discussion around program metrics: What’s working and what isn’t? How do you properly incent all contributors and stakeholders to codify your program goals?  With Jimmy Iannuzzi, nTech
  • 2:20 Breakouts in 2 Rounds (See below)
  • 3:15 Zoom Program Concludes
  • 3:30 1-1s begin
  • 5:00 1-1s conclude

Small Group Breakouts


Worker Retention in a Stimulus Market

How can we improve worker retention especially in lower wage industrial roles?

Cara Kresge, Guidant Global


What so-called 'Best Practices' drive you nuts?

Tenure management, performance metrics, contact with hiring managers, etc…

Steve Dern, Evaluent Talent Solutions


Meaningful Metrics

So many metrics to manage… Which are the ones that really matter and how can we improve them?

Jean-Marie Medina, DTCC and Jimmy Iannuzzi, nTech


Benefits of Large vs. Small Supply Base

Round robin sharing of why and when different size supplier lists work.

Kristin Clewes, nextSource









Featured Attendees

Aaron Cohen

Workforce Logiq
Director, Supplier Relations

Adam Nicholson

Senior Director, PMO

Angelina Zambrotta

PRO Unlimited
Sr. Program Manager (Novartis)

Bradley Pierson

Hays Talent Solutions
Managing Director, Americas

Brian Clark

Sr. Vice President

Cara Kresge

Guidant Global
Director, Global Service Excellence

Connie Chiasson

Sr. National Account Manager

Daniel Hall

Operations Specialist - Customer Engagement & Service Excellence

Greg Krueger

Geometric Results
Program Director

Jean-Marie Medina

Global Lead, Talent Acquisition Operations

Jennifer Sherman

Account Manager

Jody Mohammed

Geometric Results
VP, Partnerships & Solutions

Karen Bruns

Draper Jones

Karen Maarouf

Workforce Logiq
Vice President, Supplier Relations

Kate McNee

PRO Unlimited
Sr. Manager, Compliance and Operational Audit

Kathy Hardy

Kelly Discover
VP, Officer, Kelly Discover

Kristin Clewes

VP Workforce Solutions

Liana McGrath

Randstad Sourceright
Sr. Director, Client Services

Lisa Diaz

Pontoon Solutions
Sr Program Director

Lori Bradsell

Director, Client Services

Michael Kilburg

Geometric Results
Supplier Relations Lead

Michael Matherly

SVP Strategy

Minette Holcombe

Talent Solutions TAPFIN
Resource Professional - Honeywell Global CW Program

Prabakaran M

Allegis Global Solutions
CWS Program Manager - APAC

Richard Keith

Senior Operations Manager

Steve Dern

Evaluent Talent Solutions
EVP, Talent Solutions

Salema Rice

Geometric Results
Chief Data Officer


Check us out with no obligation. Listen to leaders in the industry live and unplugged every day for free. Maybe you’ll decide to move up to Contributor after a few weeks. Thanks for being a part of ClubVMSA!

Please select your community:


If you run a Contingent Workforce Program at a Fortune 1000 Company, your membership is on us!  Gain Buyer Insights; join a Mastermind pod and attend our virtual conferences to build your own network and continuously improve your global talent programs. Thanks for being a part of ClubVMSA!

The Communications Decency Act or “CDA”, 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1), states, “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” Because the information supplied to this list is authored by users of VMS Accelerator’s, Inc. site, we cannot be legally regarded as the “publisher or speaker” of that information. The same law applies to sites like Facebook or GlassDoor – users who post information on these sites are responsible for what they write, but the operators of the sites are not. This is also consistent with our website Terms of Use.

The reasons for this law are to protect free speech and to encourage the availability of information on the Internet. See generally Batzel v. Smith, 333 F.3d 1018, 1027-28 (9th Cir. 2003) (recognizing, “Making interactive computer services and their users liable for the speech of third parties would severely restrict the information available on the Internet.”). See also Caraccioli v. Facebook, Inc., 167 F. Supp.3d 1056, 1065 (N.D. Cal. 2016) (purpose of CDA immunity is “to spare interactive computer service providers the ‘grim choice’ of becoming fully responsible for third-party content” by permitting them some ability to edit third-party content without also becoming liable for all defamatory or otherwise unlawful messages that they do not edit or delete.) We cannot possibly monitor the accuracy of the huge volume of information we are receiving for this list. If interactive websites were liable for information that the site did not create, this would restrict free speech, as fewer and fewer sites would be willing to permit users to post anything at all.